Note: This section is designed to accommodate programs that provide two levels of service: (1) family preservation and stabilization services, and (2) intensive family preservation and stabilization services. Intensive programs typically serve families with children at greater risk of being removed from the home, respond to referrals or requests for service within a shorter period of time, provide more frequent and intensive services, and place stricter limits on caseload size.
Families can face a wide range of challenges, including:
- family violence, physical and/or emotional abuse, and neglect;
- parent-child conflicts, including those that result in a child running away;
- housing problems or financial distress;
- substance use conditions;
- mental health conditions or serious emotional disturbances;
- delinquency or incarceration;
- death, divorce, or separation of parents;
- resettlement-related stresses experienced by immigrant and refugee families; and/or
- special needs presented by chronic illnesses or handicapping conditions.
Note: The Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), which governs state proceedings involving Indian children, establishes minimum federal requirements for both the removal of Indian children from their families and the placement of Indian children in foster and adoptive homes that support the child’s connection to their culture and heritage. ICWA requires that active efforts be made to prevent removal or support reunification. Active efforts include full engagement with the family, the provision of more intensive remedial and rehabilitative services, and caseworkers who actively assist the family in accessing necessary services from outside resources. Family Preservation Services are just one option in a continuum of support services that may be provided to families to prevent removal or support reunification. As such, agencies should familiarize themselves with provisions of ICWA and its implications for family preservation services. The agency should have early and ongoing communication with the child’s tribe to ensure a full range of resources are made available to the family in support of ICWA’s active efforts requirements. This requires inclusion of tribal representatives throughout all aspects of service delivery, including, but not limited to, assessment, service planning, case closing, and aftercare. Additional opportunities for inclusion are identified in the standards.
While collaboration with federally recognized tribes is required by ICWA, agencies should reach out to tribal representatives in cases involving federally non-recognized tribes as well, as their involvement in the case will improve access to culturally-relevant resources and help establish a heightened sense of belonging and connectivity to the child’s extended family, clan, or tribe.
Local Indian organizations are not granted the same rights as federally recognized tribes under the Indian Child Welfare Act; however, there may be circumstances under which their involvement is necessary and appropriate. These organizations can facilitate the child’s connection to his or her tribe, inform the family and the agency of services available to the child, act as an advocate for the Indian child and his or her family, and provide ongoing support and information. This involvement is particularly important when the child’s tribe does not have the infrastructure to participate formally in the case or when the tribe is geographically distant from the child’s home and their participation is somewhat limited.