The agency establishes the well-being of individuals as its primary responsibility and eliminates the risk, or appearance, of a conflict of interest.
Interpretation: A conflict of interest exists when an action made on behalf of the individual may be seen as self-serving to the guardianship worker or the agency as a whole.
Whenever possible, the guardianship program:
Update: Revised Standard, Added Interpretation - 06/01/10
PA-AG 6.01 Original Standard: Whenever possible, the individual should be referred to services offered by outside providers except when an appropriate provider is unavailable.
Interpretation: When the guardianship program is part of a larger agency or entity, it should have the authority to make independent decisions in order to to avoid conflicts due to the potentially competing interests of the larger agency or entity. Exceptions to element (b) should be made only: (1) when an appropriate outside service provider is unavailable, and (2) when the exception is in the best interest of the individual served.
When the agency refers the individual to services offered by a government agency with direct oversight of the guardianship program, reasons for the arrangement should be documented in the case record.
The agency discloses any potential conflict of interest to all involved parties including the court, the individual, and his or her family as appropriate. Update: Revised Standard, Added Interpretation - 06/01/10
PA-AG 6.03 Original Standard: The agency should disclose any potential conflict of interest to all involved parties including the court, service recipient, and his or her family as appropriate.
Interpretation: For example, if the agency acts as both guardian and direct service provider, the court should be notified.
The agency only petitions the court for its own appointment as guardian when no other entity is available.
All guardianship fees are reported to and approved by the court.
Update: Added Standard - 06/01/10
Added Standard
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||





