Introduction
|
COA’s Governance standards address several developments related to the concept of leadership: public sector discussion influencing accountability in the nonprofit sector; evidence found in the mental health literature of an association between the leadership and culture of a human service organization and the achievement of positive outcomes; and efforts to strengthen the theoretical and practice connection between governance and leadership. Current trends and knowledge, in addition to broad-based expert consensus and common understanding, point to the importance of these standards. The governing body's influence also is reflected in core concepts found in the five other Administration and Management Standards sections. The standards draw upon results of recent studies that examine how excellence develops over time in non-profit organizations. Other recent scholarship underscores the role of leadership in governance and promotes consideration of consistency between type of organization and type of governing/advisory function, and a “good fit” between advisory approach, member composition, and an organization’s governance demands. Community responsiveness is considered to be as important as meeting oversight responsibilities.
Interpretation: In the context of Employee Assistance Program (EAP) services, the community, as used in these standards, is defined more specifically as the host or customer organization, subcontracting organizations, and the covered individuals eligible to receive services from the EAP.
Note: Please see Tip_Sheet:_EAP_Parent_Companies and Self_Paced_Training:_Governance_(GOV) in the Tools Index for additional assistance with this standard. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||





