Note: The Standards can accommodate both comprehensive and targeted community initiatives. For example, while one initiative might aim to promote broad-based change across all community dimensions, another might have a more targeted focus, such as promoting public safety or decreasing youth substance use.
Initiatives may also function somewhat differently depending on the type and origin of the initiative. For example, if the initiative is funded by a federal grant that stipulates the initiative’s focus and requires a certain level of involvement by the lead organization (i.e., the organization seeking accreditation), it may not be possible for the initiative to operate with as much autonomy as it might if it were a purely grassroots initiative.
Initiatives may cover a wide range of areas and seek a wide range of outcomes. Possible areas of focus include, but are not limited to: economic opportunity and security; physical development and infrastructure; safety and security; health and wellness, education; civic participation; cultural enrichment; and social capital.
Note: Many of COA’s Service Standards incorporate some of the principles that underlie community building. This section goes above and beyond, and is designed for organizations that play a more active and deliberate role in facilitating community change.
If an organization primarily builds and improves the community by providing services to individuals (e.g., by providing Workforce Development Services (WFD), or Case Management Services (CM)), the organization should complete the other section of standards. Organizations that provide services to individuals and play an active role in facilitating community change should complete both sections of standards. For example, an organization that promotes community change by both providing case management and convening community stakeholders should complete both CM and CCI.