Personnel are qualified, and receive support, to promote the safety and well-being of children and families, and facilitate permanency within established timeframes.
Interpretation: KC 16 refers to employees only. Kinship caregivers are not considered personnel.
Note: When the organization is unable to fully implement one or more of the standards within this section, intensive efforts should be made to fully implement the other standards. For example, if the organization is unable to recruit workers with specific qualifications, it can ensure that appropriate supervision and workload standards are implemented.
Kinship care workers are qualified by:
Note: Research has shown that workers with MSW and BSW degrees receive higher ratings on quality assurance scales and on state merit examinations. Additionally, while it may be more expensive to hire workers with MSWs, there should be a cost savings in the reduced amount of training and supervision that would be required for such workers.
Supervisors are qualified by an advanced degree in social work or another comparable human service field, and 2 years experience working with children and families, preferably in kinship care services.
Supervisors or experienced workers provide additional support when personnel are new or are still developing competencies.
Kinship care workers have the competencies and support needed to:
Interpretation: Competency can be demonstrated through education, training, or experience.
Kinship care workers and supervisors, depending on job responsibilities, are knowledgeable about provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) including:
Interpretation: The organization can consider the average number of cases where the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) applies when determining which personnel need to be trained. Screening personnel must be trained on the relevant provisions of ICWA.
NA The organization only provides informal kinship care services.
Employee workloads support the achievement of client outcomes, are regularly reviewed, and are based on an assessment of the following:
Interpretation: Case complexity can take into account: intensity of child and family needs, size of the family, and the goal of the case. Generally, caseloads do not exceed 18 children or 8 children with special therapeutic needs. However, there are circumstances under which caseloads may exceed these limits. For example, caseload size may vary depending upon the volume of administrative case functions (e.g., entering notes, filing, etc.) assigned to the worker. Caseloads may also be higher when organizations are faced with temporary vacancies on staff. Note: The evaluation of this standard will focus on whether the assigned workload is manageable for staff, taking into account the factors cited in the standard and interpretation. The specific caseload sizes stated in the interpretation are only a suggestion of what might be appropriate. Each organization should determine what caseload size is appropriate, and reviewers will evaluate: (1) whether the organization’s designated caseload size reflects a manageable workload, and (2) whether the organization maintains caseloads of the size it deemed appropriate.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||





