DV 3: Safety Assessment and Plan
|
|
Survivors and providers work together to assess needs and risk factors and develop individualized safety plans.
Within 24 hours or the first working day after initiation of services, survivors receive an initial assessment of:
- immediate needs, including medical and dental care, legal assistance, food, shelter, and clothing; and
- safety and risk factors for the survivor, the survivor’s children, and any other involved family members.
Safety planning helps survivors to:
- assess the potential for short-term and long-term physical and emotional risks;
- identify and evaluate available options; and
- make informed decisions.
Interpretation: It may be especially important to assess and discuss how to minimize both short-term and long-term risks when a survivor is considering leaving an abusive relationship.
 |
|
Research Note: Although leaving an abusive relationship has the potential to end the violence an individual faces, some literature suggests that danger, including risk of death, is especially high when a survivor tries to leave an abusive partner. |
 |
Survivors guide the development of detailed, comprehensive safety plans that:
- reflect their stated needs and goals;
- are tailored to their particular strengths, needs, risks, abilities, resources, and circumstances;
- build on realistic possibilities and options;
- prepare them to promote their safety in various circumstances and places; and
- respond to the needs of children, as appropriate.
Interpretation: Plans should help survivors prepare for immediate escape, if necessary, by identifying: (1) safe places to go in an emergency, (2) safe contacts, and (3) items to take when leaving. Survivors and providers should regularly re-evaluate safety plans to ensure that they continue to meet survivors’ needs.
 |
Research Note: Literature highlights the importance of helping survivors develop safety plans regardless of whether they: (1) have left the perpetrator, (2) are in the process of leaving the perpetrator, or (3) will remain involved with the perpetrator. Some research also suggests that survivors who have left an abusive relationship may underestimate their personal risk of returning. |
 |
When survivors wish to involve perpetrators in services, providers help them explore what they want to achieve by involving the perpetrator, and evaluate the risks involved.
Interpretation: This standard does not require organizations to involve perpetrators in services. When perpetrators are involved in services the organization should have
procedures to protect the safety and well-being of survivors and their children, and the survivor’s safety plan should address issues specific to perpetrator involvement.
 |
|
Research Note: Because of the potential for danger, as well as the difference in power between the perpetrator and the survivor, some literature cautions against engaging survivors and perpetrators in services requiring cooperative participation, such as couples counseling. Related literature adds that this type of counseling is not indicated unless: (1) both parties request it, (2) the perpetrator has received extensive treatment, and (3) the abuse has ended, which can be difficult to determine. Other literature states that the evidence about the advisability of couples counseling is inconclusive, but notes the need for caution to prevent increased danger. |
 |