JJD 1: Engagement and Assessment
|
|
The organization contacts youth promptly, and conducts
assessments that identify risks, needs, and strengths and are the basis for service
planning and delivery.
Interpretation: COA recognizes that youth may be screened and assessed elsewhere before they are referred to the organization. However, the organization can still take steps to further evaluate youth after referral. At minimum, the organization should review the results of previous assessments to ensure they meet COA’s standards, and conduct additional assessments if those done previously are insufficient.
The organization responds to referrals by:
- contacting youth promptly, within specified timeframes; and
- evaluating youth to identify any urgent risks and needs and determine whether youth are appropriate for the program.
Interpretation: When youth are deemed inappropriate the organization should transfer them to more appropriate programs, or advocate for transfer with the court or public agency with jurisdiction over youth. Organizations required by contract to accept all referrals may not be able to advocate for transfer, and should make every effort to ensure youth are referred to them only when services and supervision provided are a good match for youth, as referenced in JJD 4.01.
When another party (such as the court) determines the date youth are to report to the program, it may not be relevant for the organization to contact youth. However, the organization should follow up if youth do not report as scheduled, and should still evaluate youths’ appropriateness.
Comprehensive assessments are conducted in a standardized manner, and identify:
- youths’ problems and needs;
- youths’ strengths and assets; and
- risks youth pose to the community.
Interpretation: Relevant areas to consider include a youth’s social skills and behavior, physical and mental health, substance use, family, education, and vocation. Special attention should be paid to any concerns identified in previous screenings and assessments.
When possible, assessments should be based on multiple sources of information, including youth interviews, observations of youths’ behavior, interviews with family members and previous service providers, and case records. Organizations that do not have the resources to comprehensively assess all youth in all relevant areas, for example, mental health, may conduct systematic service need screenings to determine when youth are in need of more in-depth assessments.
When a program is designed to provide less-intensive day services, it may be appropriate to complete a more minimal assessment.
Note: Refer to the
Assessment Matrix for further guidance on assessment criteria. The elements of the matrix can be tailored according to the needs of specific individuals or service design.
When youth are in need of further
evaluation, the organization promptly provides or arranges for specialized assessments.
Assessments are conducted in a responsive manner that includes attention to age, developmental level, gender, language,
culture, race,
ethnicity, religion, geographic location, sexual orientation, and trauma history.
Assessments are conducted within specified timeframes and are updated periodically.