Collaboration and coordination increase the ability of the organization, community, and system as a whole to supervise and support youth, and promote their chances of succeeding both during and after confinement.
Interpretation: This core concept standard is intended to address the range of organizations and agencies likely to serve or encounter youth who are or may become involved with the juvenile justice system. Relevant organizations, agencies, and other parties to consider include: juvenile court personnel, including judges; probation; parole; law enforcement; prosecution and defense attorneys; representatives of state agencies responsible for youth corrections and detention; child welfare agencies; schools; mental health care providers; substance use treatment providers; medical and health care providers; and community organizations, including parks and recreation services, libraries, cultural institutions, businesses, and faith-based institutions.
Note: Collaboration by nature involves other organizations and agencies, and COA recognizes that there are obvious limits as to how much an individual organization without statutory authority can do. However, organizations are still expected to take steps to encourage the collaboration and coordination that can help promote positive outcomes for youth.
The organization collaborates with relevant parties, including the court and the public agency responsible for juvenile justice, to encourage placement of youth into programs that address their risks and needs in the least restrictive environment necessary.
Interpretation: Since a comprehensive range of services must be available for appropriate placements to occur, it may also be important to advocate for the availability of alternative services if they are lacking or inaccessible.
Interpretation: Placement into pre-adjudicatory detention should be based on risks related to safety and failure to appear, not needs. Organizations providing detention services should advocate with appropriate parties to reduce the incidence of unnecessary detention and the length of time youth are detained without services.
When youth have needs the organization cannot meet, alternative arrangements are made to deliver appropriate services.
The organization collaborates with other organizations and agencies involved with youth to promote the delivery of comprehensive, coordinated services during confinement.
Interpretation: This includes organizations and agencies involved with youth both during and prior to confinement. When youth receive services from other providers while they are confined, the organization should collaborate with those providers to eliminate service duplication and ensure that issues are addressed in a cohesive manner. However, even when an organization provides all services directly, it can still collaborate with relevant court and legal personnel, the public agency with statutory authority, and any organizations and agencies that may have been involved with youth prior to confinement. As referenced in CR 2, when information will be shared with other organizations and agencies, youth should be informed of any limits on confidentiality before they disclose information. This may be especially important when the organization serves youth prior to adjudication, and youth might reveal self-incriminating information that could potentially be used against them in legal proceedings.
The organization facilitates appropriate collaboration and coordination by identifying laws, regulations, and other requirements governing information sharing and confidentiality, and:
Interpretation: When possible, this should include procedures and/or agreements designed to protect youth from self-incrimination. As referenced in JJC 5.03, this may be especially important when organizations serve youth prior to adjudication.
The organization promotes a more comprehensive understanding of the different organizations, agencies, and systems serving youth by:
The organization reaches out to community resources and partners to:
NA The organization provides only detention services.
To promote service continuity and facilitate the delivery of aftercare that helps youth maintain gains made during confinement, the organization identifies, reaches out to, and collaborates with organizations and agencies that may serve youth after release.
Interpretation: When another party (such as an aftercare case manager) is primarily responsible for making connections with the providers and resources youth access after release, the organization may implement this standard by partnering with the other party to facilitate reentry planning and follow-up, as referenced in JJC 15 and 16.
Note: Aftercare planning and provision are addressed further in JJC 15 and JJC 16.
NA The organization provides only detention services.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||





