RTX 1: Needs Based Access to Service
|
|
The organization makes every effort to ensure residential treatment services are available only when a thorough
assessment of current need and prior services indicate an individual requires, and will benefit from, a total milieu environment, active psycho-therapeutic and psycho-educational interventions, and around the clock care for a specified period of time.
The residential treatment program defines in writing:
- admission criteria, including age, developmental stage, and available support resources;
- scope of services, special areas of expertise, and range of client issues addressed;
- service options and levels of care;
- opportunities for family involvement and support;
- opportunities for participation in community activities; and
- promotion of housing unit compatibility based on age, interests and group composition.
Interpretation: The organization heightens optimal use of limited residential treatment resources through linkages with the service community and referral sources to define when residential services are the best available treatment option.
 |
Research Note: Studies designed to identify predictors of discharge outcomes have noted that residential treatment admission criteria can be vague, categorical, and/or wide ranging and noted the importance and feasibility of linking client characteristics to interventions and outcomes. |
 |
Admission decisions are made by a team of psychiatric, medical, psychological, social service, education, and other professionals, as appropriate to the individual’s needs, service history, and service provided.
Interpretation: When facilities provide activities under
contract with a “no reject” provision the
interdisciplinary team reviews such admissions with attention to any
special needs or services the individual may require.
 |
Research Note: Recent research on post-discharge outcomes suggests that improved needs-based decision making is worthy of study. Data collection and dissemination may be especially important when residential treatment is routinely approved on a regional, county, or district basis for individuals who did not first receive intensive support services and for members of groups for whom poor discharge outcomes have been found. Organizations with the capacity to provide referral sources with outcomes data may be able to contribute to improved placement decision making |
 |
 |
Research Note: Results of a residential treatment center study following three entry cohorts from admission through discharge using event history analysis to examine length of stay found that mental health issues, including crisis while in treatment, extended average length of stay and that youth with a substance abuse history are more likely to leave care by running away than children without substance abuse histories. Results suggest careful screening for substance abuse problems so children can be identified for intensive substance use prevention and intervention, and improved data collection over the course of stay for mental health concerns including standardized measures and detailed mental health assessments. |
 |
The resident and his or her family, and/or guardian are engaged in an informative placement process and are:
- helped to understand the admission decision;
- prepared for admission, and given the opportunity for a pre-admission visit, whenever possible; and
- apprised of any available options.
 |
|
Research Note: A recent state-wide study of residential treatment child and youth outcomes suggested a reexamination of how admission decisions are made, since placement of children and youth in residential treatment centers routinely occurs without youth and foster parent participation. These results are bolstered by qualitative study findings that youth rarely have involvement in placement decisions. |
 |
The program describes:
- personal items a resident may bring with them, consistent with a safe, therapeutic setting;
- items that are discouraged or prohibited; and
- any safety procedures the program follows or consequences that can result when prohibited items are brought to campus.
Interpretation: Personal items a resident might bring with them include, for example, photos, books, a favorite toy, clothing, or hobby materials.